• The morning after: Minneapolis, Minnesota’s terrorism trial

    Opinions November 21, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: FHR. The three young men who went to trial and lost paid a high price for exercising their constitutional right to a jury trial. Mohamed Farah, 22, was sentenced to 30 years and lifetime supervision; Abdirahman Daud, 22, the same (30 years); while Guled Omar, 22, accused of being the “emir” of the group, received a sentenced of 35 years and lifetime supervision. Beyond these barbaric sentences which mock the principle of justice, this writer was also deeply disturbed by a number of statements this African American jurist made from the bench about many of the young men being (in his and the judicial system’s estimation) unredeemable, and the suggestion that terrorism in America was something new. While terrorism cases may be something selectively new in American courts, the fact of the matter is that this plague is as old as the “republic” itself!

  • Congress shows how not to respond to Donald Trump’s terrible nominees

    Opinions November 21, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: Zaid Jilani in The Intercept. Donald Trump has nominated some of the worst of the worst to serve in his cabinet — a rogues gallery of apologists for torture, racial and religious discrimination, deportation, and all manner of abuses of civil and human rights. But rather than present a vigorous and united front against these nominees and demand that Trump replace them, Democrats and Republicans who in the past have been sensitive to concerns about civil liberties are instead offering to give them a chance — or actually supporting them. There has been one notable exception: the outcry from Democrats about Trump’s selection of Breitbart News executive Steve Bannon as his chief strategist. Anti-Semitism, then, would appear to be a litmus test for congressional Democrats. But not Islamophobia, or the advocacy of human rights abuses like torture.

  • Counter terror smarter

    Opinions October 26, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: U.S. News. When what you’re doing isn’t working, doing more of it isn’t the solution. We can’t keep responding to attacks the same way and expecting a different result. There is a better way to counter terrorism, and a more effective model that we can adopt, but first government officials must abandon failing strategies. When what you’re doing isn’t working, doing more of it isn’t the solution. We can’t keep responding to attacks the same way and expecting a different result. There is a better way to counter terrorism, and a more effective model that we can adopt, but first government officials must abandon failing strategies.

  • What Muslims need to know about CVE

    Opinions September 23, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: Muslim Matters. CVE efforts are solely concerned with Muslim “radicalization” and government officials are making little effort to conceal that fact. . . . Muslim American terrorism, then, has been a very small, very low percentage of the overall violence in the United States.” . . . In spite of the abundance of available research arguing the contrary, popular notions of an ideological struggle remain the paradigm of choice from which the vast majority of CVE discussions emerge.

  • The reduction of Muslim Americans

    Opinions September 14, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: Other Words. Both Democrats and Republicans are spreading the same Islamophobic message: you’re either with us, or you’re against us. At the Democratic and Republican National Conventions, I witnessed our leading politicians broadcast the kind of Islamophobic messages that can motivate the murder of innocent Muslims. Millions of Americans who followed the DNC heard former President Bill Clinton speak these words about American Muslims: “If you’re a Muslim and you love America and freedom and you hate terror, stay here and help us win.” As a Muslim-American myself, I’m appalled by the suggestion that unless I prove I love freedom and hate terror, I may not be afforded the right to “stay.” I don’t see any other groups faced with this prerequisite.

  • Dear Americans: This law makes it possible to arrest and jail you indefinitely anytime

    Opinions September 2, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: Steve Mariotti in The Huffington Post. In 2012, the U.S. Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with relatively little attention from the media―despite the freedoms it obliterated. The NDAA was enacted to empower the U.S. military to fight the war on terror. But buried in this law are two provisions (Sections 1021 and 1022) that authorize the indefinite military detention, without charge or trial, of any person labeled a “belligerent”―including an American citizen. These NDAA provisions (which have been re-approved by Congress and signed by President Obama every year since 2012) override habeas corpus―the essence of our justice system. Habeas corpus is the vital legal procedure that prevents the government from detaining you indefinitely without showing just cause. When will this bill expire?When the war on terror ends, that’s when these extraordinary military powers will end. And in all probability, the answer is never.

  • The FBI’s secret war

    Opinions August 31, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: Jacobin. To get a sense of how little has changed, consider the FBI today. The Bureau now spends an inordinate amount of time and resources paying or otherwise bribing criminals into becoming paid informers, and using them to goad and entrap young, poor, and sometimes mentally handicapped Muslim men into carrying out terrorist attacks they would neither have the wherewithal nor intention of otherwise committing. Since 2014, at least eighty-eight people have been arrested on charges of supporting ISIS, many of which had little or no connection to the terrorist group. That doesn’t even count those arrested on more generic terrorism charges, typically in plots the FBI themselves have created. This is a continuation of methods the FBI pioneered during the COINTELPRO years, when the Bureau regularly paid provocateurs to infiltrate student protesters and urge violence.

  • Jonathan P. Baird: The dark night of Mohamedou Ould Slahi

    Opinions August 25, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: Concord Monitor. In a little noticed story on July 14, the Periodic Review Board of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp approved the release of Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a Mauritanian citizen and author. What is unique about Slahi is that he is a best-selling author. In his book, Guantanamo Diary, he described his ordeal. Slahi spent nearly 14 years at Guantanamo. He was never charged with any crime. Author John le Carre described Slahi’s book as “a vision of hell, beyond Orwell, beyond Kafka.” Slahi’s story shows the danger in normalizing torture. Innocent people can be swept up in dragnets and get subjected to the sickest abuse. Guantanamo has done enormous damage to the moral authority of the United States. Torture leaves an indelible stain. We must never forget that torture remains a crime.

  • New book alleges CIA manipulates Hollywood to promote war on terror

    Opinions July 21, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: The Hollywood Reporter. You won’t actually see the words, “made with the cooperation of the CIA” in the credits of Zero Dark Thirty or Argo, but these films carry the Agency’s seal of approval, which is less about authenticity and more about myth-making. That’s what journalist Nicholas Schou calls it in his new book Spooked: How the CIA Manipulates the Media and Hoodwinks Hollywood. Zero Dark Thirty enjoyed abundant access to CIA headquarters, including people whose role in the mission was still classified, as well as a private dinner with some of those involved in the bin Laden takedown.

  • The dangers of Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) programs

    Opinions July 19, 2016 at 0 comments

    Source: Psychology Today. Currently, the FBI, in collaboration with the National Institute of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and other government agencies, is again launching programs that are at best doomed–and at worst designed—to disrupt the Muslim communities in cities where they are launched. Under the umbrella term Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) the programs include attempts, with no basis in evidence, to predict who might some day become violent due to a passionate investment in a cause. In the absence of evidence, the agencies are now asking people close to young Muslims to report to law enforcement, including local and federal enforcement agencies, on kids who they just think (note, without any knowledge of what the actual signs are) might be on a path towards extremism. We will not be participating in any CVE programs, and we strongly encourage other mental health professionals to also refuse.